Today, 14th August, is the official deadline for comments. However, submissions will still be allowed until Tuesday, 19th August. So please keep sending those objections in! They will be registered and posted on the portal. Numbers are important!
Welcome to Save Our Somerset Levels
We are a group of local residents and farmers fighting a proposed industrial-scale solar plant development on Redlands Farm at Pedwell, Somerset​
We rely on donations and the generous contributions by our supporters to fight this development.
For enquiries about making donations please click here for our contact information and bank details
​
Planning history
ELGIN ENERGY applied in 2023 (2023/1892/FUL) for planning permission to cover 140 acres of prime farmland on Redlands Farm with solar panels. That application was refused last year, so Elgin re-applied early in July 2025, this time to use 132.5 acres of the same farmland for the same solar development but with a small reduction in the number of solar panels. This development will in effect be an extension of the farm's existing 40-acre solar generating plant. If approved, most of Redlands Farm's land will be covered by photovoltaic panels to become one of the largest solar developments in Somerset when combined with the farm's existing solar plant!
​
ELGIN's 2023 application was refused by the case officer in May 2024 for the following reasons:
Land​
Insufficient information provided (a) to determine the grade of the agricultural land (b) to demonstrate alternative sites of lower quality agricultural land have been sufficiently explored or (c) to demonstrate that this site is necessary for the proposed development.
​Archaeology
There is the potential for archaeological remains on site but insufficient information has been submitted to properly assess their interest.​
Traffic
It has not been demonstrated that the development would not result in an unacceptable impact on the highway network.​
​Floods
It has not been demonstrated that the development passes the sequential test for flood risk.​
​Maintenance
It has not been demonstrated that the development would allow the Internal Drainage Board to access the ditches on the site.​
​Drainage
It has not been demonstrated that the development would ensure a satisfactory approach to surface water management.
​​Birds
The site is likely to be functionally linked to the nearby SPA/Ramsar site through usage by lapwing and other birds for wintering. Insufficient information has been provided to assess the potential impact of the development on the SPA/Ramsar site. (SPA = Special Protection Area that covers the Levels from Bridgwater to the Mendip Hills)
​​Noise
The development would be located in a tranquil area and the noise emissions associated with the development would be contrary to Mendip and Sedgemoor Local Plan policies.
​
​Landscape
(a) The development would significantly degrade the quality of the local landscape and have a significant adverse impact on local landscape character. (b) The development would not contribute positively to the maintenance and enhancement of local character, identity and distinctiveness. (c) The development would not protect or enhance a valued landscape. (d) The introduction of new solar panels would bring further change to the visual characteristics of the area, and this is considered to result in harm to its character.
​
​Protected species
Insufficient information and survey effort has been submitted regarding the presence of bats and dormice.
​
The new application (2025/1289/FUL Mendip east) provides more information in response to the above reasons for refusal and makes a minor change to the site layout: the solar panels on a field at the northeast corner of the site have been removed.
This was Elgin's proposed development plan in 2023:
And this is the current plan with the panels at the northeast corner of the site removed:
“We need renewable energy as the climate situation becomes increasingly serious. We are now in the situation where drastic changes could and are being made to the countryside we all know and love. In trying to avoid dangerous climate change we need to make sure we do not destroy the very thing we are trying to save” (Local resident Trevor Bailey)
It makes no sense to destroy an environment to protect the environment!
Time is running out!
The deadline for submitting comments/objections is 14th August, 21 days after the planning notices were posted on the site.
Please scroll down to see the list of topics we are addressing in our objections.
This is how you can help us stop this development
-
Elgin's re-application addresses the 10 reasons for refusal listed above. Please look at each reason and compare it with the corresponding response by Elgin and then decide if you are satisfied with their version.
-
Don't get distracted by the reams of technical support information and references to planning policies; just use your instinctive judgement to come to an opinion. Write from the heart - a personal view carries significant weight in the minds of a planning committee when it considers the balance of benefits versus harm of an application.
​
-
​When writing an objection try to tie it to a national and local planning policy referred to in Elgin's relevant application document, and use your own interpretation if it makes more sense to you. Look at the delegated reports (prepared by the planning officer for the planning committee) of recent solar decisions, including the report relating to the refused 2023 application.
-
The officer sets out at the beginning of their report the applicable policies (national -NPPF- and local) and then goes through them and all of the statutory consultees' responses (eg highways, heritage, landscape), finally recommending whether the application should be granted or refused. In doing so, the officer will balance the benefits of the proposal against any perceived harm. Have a look at a recent one from the Mendip (East) planning team - it should succinctly help you to ascertain the relevant policies.
​
-
Also check Mendip's validation requirements to see if you can challenge the actual validation about missing information.
​
-
Please write in a friendly, relaxed tone, always respectful and courteous and avoid expressing personal opinions about the planning process, however frustrated you may feel about past planning results.
​
-
Compose your letter ('comment' in planning parlance) in a format like MS Word that can be cut and pasted on the planning portal. This saves time and allows you to correct mistakes and to make it more succinct - shorter letters are more likely to be read by time-strapped councillors.
​
-
You will be asked to include your name, address and contact details on your letter, but your contact details will be redacted before it is posted on the planning portal.
​​
Posting your letter on the portal
When you are ready to post your letter (comment) on the planning portal, open Somerset Council's website, select 'Planning, buildings and land' followed by 'View and comment on a planning application' and then select 'Mendip (East)'. Click on 'Find a Planning East application' and enter the planning reference number
2025/1289/FUL in the search field. You will be taken to the list of application documents and instructions for making a submission (comment).
​
Specialist Consultants
We have asked specialist consultants to help us stop this development because we don't have the professional expertise and the experience to tackle the technical and planning aspects of the application. They were instrumental in defeating the 2023 application and we welcome their continued support this time round. They will be submitting key objections on our behalf. We pay their professional fees with the donations we get from supporters. Please help us by contributing to our campaign funds.
Please click here for our bank and contact details.
Project background
Located largely in the old Mendip District, part of the project site also extends into the old Sedgemoor District and the site (not the solar panels) straddles Nythe Road. It covers 16 fields of mainly grade 3a best and most versatile (BMV) farmland comprising fertile peat moorland and hillside pastures. Formerly an emerging organic dairy farm, the dairy herd was sold in 2021, which left the farm committed to producing solar energy as its principal business.
​
Redlands Farm recently supplemented their business with a holiday let lodge. The June 2023 Supporting Statement for their planning application said:
“The applicants wish to tap into the ever-growing trend for visitors wanting an active element to their holiday and Redlands Farm is an ideal location for this. They are intending to market The Lodge to guests wishing to explore the natural beauty of the Levels environment and the Polden Hills, including walkers, cyclists and horse riders. The setting of the farm, with excellent views of the open countryside and direct access to the extensive public footpath network provides ample opportunities for this”.
The Lodge overlooks the application site. How does an industrial solar plant sit in these ‘excellent views of the open countryside’?
Not persuaded? Please read on…
Our campaign is not against green energy initiatives such as wind and solar energy. We would support solar panels on roofs, brownfield sites and previously developed land. Well-screened, small scale and unobtrusive solar panels on poor farmland may be acceptable to local communities following a proper consultation process.
We are against the Nythe Road solar farm expansion not only because it is inappropriate and too big, but also because if approved it will tempt other farmers on The Levels to follow suit. Current planning policy has not yet caught up with the environmental impact and loss of food security brought about by the solar industry. The new government’s relentless drive for green energy encourages developers to cover ever more farmland with solar panels, ignoring the huge potential of roof-mounted solar.
​
What price our green energy?
The choice of site is not related to landscape and biodiversity concerns. Developers are profit-driven. They look for sites located under or close to existing power lines to reduce the costs of connecting to the national grid and then attempt to vindicate their decision by promising measures to mitigate the harm they will cause.​ We and our children pay for the inevitable harm to wildlife habitat and loss of amenity.​ Nobody knows what the true environmental cost of solar energy is.
But we do know that electricity prices will increase. Solar developers and landowners make a killing. Farmers can earn up to £1,000 per acre every year for 40 years. We don’t know what Redlands Farm will be earning, but it will certainly be millions. And Elgin Energy or their successors will most likely make manyfold more, paid for by all of us - the consumers of electricity.
The dire impact of solar developments on the Somerset Levels
-
An intrinsically beautiful and unique landscape character is destroyed.
-
A valued landscape is blighted for generations to come by inappropriate industrial developments.
-
Loss of best and most versatile (BMV) farmland undermines our food security and increases imports at a high carbon cost.
-
Little is known about the long term damaging effects of soil compaction during construction and permanent shading on the ecological character of the soil.
-
Wildlife habitat is impacted, and south facing eco systems are permanently shielded from the sun with unknown long-term consequences.
-
Farming communities are torn between traditional farming and the attraction of very lucrative solar energy production.
You can help us stop the industrialisation of the Somerset Levels
-
Oppose new solar developments on the Somerset Levels while supporting solar on rooftops, brownfield sites, non-BMV and developed land.
-
Support national countryside and wildlife custodians like Somerset Wildlife Trust, CPRE, RSPB and Natural England.
-
Ask your Somerset Councillor to support the national planning policy framework (NPPF) that urges developers to protect best and most versatile (BMV) land for food production.
-
Support farming communities by buying local produce and switching to seasonal food.
Visual impact
“Further degrading such a prominent and beautiful vista is unnecessary” (Local resident Tim Cann)
The cumulative visual impact of the extended solar farm will be in full view from a public footpath crossing Pedwell Hill as well as other public access viewpoints on higher ground. When viewed from these elevated positions no amount of screen planting will hide the devastating visual harm of this development on the local landscape character. The before/after view below was taken from the public footpath on Pedwell Hill using a standard lens, looking south towards High Ham. The existing solar plant can be seen in the distance.
This view was not included in the 2023 application but is now included in the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) but without a superimposed illustrative image of the panels because a photomontage is not required by planning guidance. However, the application shows a blatantly misleading extent of the panels - please have a look at the final two images in the VIA's Vol 1.
The "after" view shows the likely visual impact a large part of the development would have on the landscape. The full spread of the solar panels continues beyond the picture frame to the left and right. The arrays appear dark because you are looking at the shaded north-facing underside of the solar panels. The photomontage was created by a member of our campaign group for illustrative purposes only, to show you what the impact on this iconic landscape would be if planning was granted.
​
Photo credit: Trevor Bailey.
​
“Whilst I support green energy initiatives when they are appropriately sited, I am against this proposed solar farm extension because it is not an appropriate use of this environmentally sensitive site. It will have a significant impact on local wildlife and damage an area of rich biodiversity which is of local and National importance. Any benefits from the solar farm cannot mitigate for the loss of land for the vital production of animal fodder and bedding material that plays an important role in our nation’s food production. The loss of such important agricultural land is not sustainable when current international food supplies are ‘fragile’, and there is a call for more food to be sourced from the UK. This is an example of the wrong development in the wrong location” (A resident of High Ham)
We would welcome your continued support and help to stop this inappropriate development. Join us on Facebook and Instagram for news, views, and campaign information.
www.facebook.com/groups/saveoursomersetlevels
Instagram: sos_somerset_levels
We would like to invite more supporters to join our private WhatsApp group. Please email us for more information: info@saveoursomersetlevels.co.uk ​​​
We value your support and thank those who would like to make a donation to help us pay our consultants and other campaign costs. Please click here for our bank details.
We are addressing these unresolved issues in Elgin’s application in our objection letters. Why not add your voice to ours? Especially if the subject affects you directly or is close to your heart:
​
• Landscape - the application does not mitigate the visual harm to the valued landscape, a key reason why the previous application was refused, and the viewpoints do not show the full extent of the solar panels.
​
• Construction traffic - the impact on Ashcott, Pedwell and Greinton is unclear and there are conflicting statements about site access, vehicle trips and vehicle types as well as the lack of wheel washing facilities at the Nythe Road site entrances.
• Farmland - contrary to national and local planning policies, the solar panels will cover 132 acres of best and most versatile (BMV) farmland, traditionally used for summer grazing when the dry upland pastures have very little feeding value.
• Birds - the loss of these breeding and feeding grounds will impact on many threatened species because the site functions in tandem with nearby nature reserves, SSSI and NPA sites in the Somerset Ramsar area.
• Bats - having failed to include a bat survey requested by Somerset Council, Elgin promises to complete the survey later this year – so their application is incomplete and should not have been accepted for scrutiny (validated).
• Archaeology - recent geo-survey findings indicated the presence of Roman artifacts and other archaeological remains that could be destroyed by construction activities, a permanent loss to future generations.
• Peat - although depleted, the peat-rich site could be restored by subsidised Environmental Land Management Schemes (ELMS) to once again perform the valuable role of sequestering carbon as an alternative to solar energy doing the same thing.
• Floods - the site is part of the local wetlands flood management system, absorbing surface water to avoid flash flooding elsewhere - a critically important function that will be compromised as a result of soil compaction during construction and concentrated run-off from the solar panels forming rivulets.
• Habitat - the impact of permanent shade and lack of rainwater under the solar panels on the natural habitat of flora and fauna is not yet fully understood, so a decision to grant consent is not without considerable risk of permanent harm to the local ecology.
• Benefits - Elgin claim that the 40MW site will deliver enough electricity to power 17,000 homes every year, a calculation based on the theoretical capacity of the panels under 24-hour sunlight every day, when the actual yield, taking into account our latitude, daylight hours and seasonal weather conditions, is only 10% of the theoretical capacity, i.e. enough to power 1,700 homes (source: Dept for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy’s Renewable Energy Planning Database).
• Sheep - Elgin suggest that sheep could graze under the panels, but anecdotal evidence tells us that it is impossible to manage the sheep because they cannot be seen and dogs can’t be used to herd them, and the poor quality vegetation under the panels has insufficient food value.
READ WHAT MEMBERS OF OUR GROUP SAY ABOUT THE REDLANDS FARM SOLAR PROJECT
We say enough is enough!​
Residents and farmers from 4 neighbouring parishes have come together to oppose plans for one of the largest solar developments in the Southwest. If Elgin Energy's expected resubmission is given consent it could result in 173.5 acres of prime farmland being covered with solar panels. Their 132.5-acre development will expand the existing 40-acre solar farm more than threefold to industrialise almost all of Redlands Farm at Pedwell.
The industrial landscape pictured behind the group is part of the existing 40-acre Redlands solar plant. It illustrates the impact that solar developments have on the landscape character of their setting. Now 10 years old, its promised screen planting is incomplete and there is no evidence of improved biodiversity, a promise typically used by developers in support of solar applications. Although this is not one of Elgin’s projects, it is an example of how futile it is to rely on planning condition enforcement by local authorities.
The curiously named “Nythe Road Solar Farm” development belies the fact that it is located on Redlands Farm, owners of the existing 40-acre solar plant. It is in effect a phase 2 extension of the existing solar farm, albeit with a different solar developer. We believe that, as well as being too big, what is proposed is inefficient in its linear and fragmented layout. It should not be designed that way even on a more suitable site elsewhere.
Money talks!
“We have had no less than 6 solar companies approach us recently to convert 200 acres of our farm into a 50MW solar farm. One of them even offered to pay us £110k up front for simply signing a contract and £900 per acre per annum index linked” (A local farming couple)
If Elgin’s application is successful, it will set a powerful precedent for other farmers on the Somerset Levels to follow suit and turn productive farmland into industrialised energy production.
Redlands Farm was a productive dairy business until 3 years ago when they sold their dairy herd. A local farmer described the farm as ‘the perfect layout for wetlands farming; with summer pastures on the moorland and winter grazing on the hillside when the lower levels are too wet’. In other words, it has been a viable, productive farm for generations. Redlands Farm can now look forward to a secure and extremely generous income from Elgin’s lease for at least 40 years if the application is approved. No wonder farmers are sorely tempted to give up farming and earn more from solar!
Why solar energy?
“Solar generation is known to be hugely inefficient. In terms of the amount of power exported to the grid, solar’s efficiency rating is between 11% and 15% whereas for offshore wind the figure is 50%”(CPRE: The Problem with Solar Farms)
​
The Government has confirmed that offshore wind will produce more than enough electricity to power every home in the country by 2030, based on current electricity usage (Build Back Greener, October 2020). If this forecast is realised both the Redlands solar plants will most likely become redundant long before the end of their respective 40-year lease periods. It will make the PV installations obsolete and derelict, with no guarantee that the sites will be reinstated to their original agricultural use. There is a real danger that they could then be seen as brownfield sites, ripe for alternative non-agricultural use.
Why prime farmland?
“Removing valuable agricultural and bio-diverse habitat from the Somerset Levels benefits no-one, especially when other more suitable brownfield sites could be used” (Local resident Charles Lock)
More than 90% of the proposed solar farm extension will cover grade 3a farmland, classified as BMV land - ‘best and most versatile’ and according to DEFRA should not be used for energy-based projects. Our farmers are custodians of our countryside, and the sector manages some 72% of UK land. Farmers support biodiversity conservation, flood alleviation, climate change mitigation and a host of other important public good services and delivery. Agriculture underpins rural communities, local infrastructure and tourism. (Trade and Agriculture Commission, March 2021)
“This Government is focused on Energy Security when Food Security is being taken for granted. The population of the UK is 67.2 million productive farmland is crucial should we need to be self-sufficient which has been brought home in light of the Ukrainian conflict. We need to preserve and protect Farmland and place solar projects on roof space and brownfield sites” (Local farmer Samantha Small)
Inappropriate location
“Building a solar farm on the sustainable farmland of the Somerset Levels is like planning a motorway through Westminster Abbey - it's the wrong object in the wrong place” (Local resident Anthony Lipmann)
The National Planning Policy Framework expects local authorities to protect and enhance valued landscapes and sites of biodiversity and recognise the character and beauty of the countryside and the benefits of the best and most versatile farmland in their policies and decisions. (Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP, August 2021) We would suggest that the existing Redlands Farm solar development should never have had permission to despoil the valued landscape of King’s Sedgemoor. Repeating the same mistake would be seen as irresponsible vandalism that extends the harm to biodiversity and ignores the character and beauty of a further 146 acres of the Somerset Levels.
Industrial scar
“Solar Farms have their place but not when it semi-industrialises prime agricultural land and tarnishes a landscape renowned for its natural beauty, wildlife habitat and attraction to tourists” (Local resident Andrew Jones)
The loss of high-quality farmland is not the only issue. Arguably of greater importance is the potential harm that these developments do to the landscape. Fields containing continuous rows of metal and glass bring a dramatic industrial scar to an otherwise rural environment which is then further damaged by perimeter security fencing, floodlighting, CCTV systems and a range of buildings housing all of the inverters and battery storage units. (CPRE-Essex Policy Statement in Regard to Solar Farms)
Uncertain Future
What guarantee is there that the land will ever revert to agriculture? Who knows. Can we rely on promises and bonds that the sites will be reinstated as farmland? Probably not. There are no examples of reinstatement because the concept is new and has yet to be tested. We may not witness it at Redlands in our lifetime if solar remains a feasible energy source. Nothing stops the solar operator applying for an extension of planning consent, as demonstrated by the recent extension granted to the existing solar farm: the original permit for 25 years has been extended to 40 years. For those of us frequenting the area a period of 40 years cannot be perceived as being temporary and the harmful effect on the landscape would prevail for far too long.
“In trying to justify solar farms Planning often call the sites temporary. But the sites have a lifetime of 40 years with no guarantee of removal at the end” (Local resident Trevor Bailey)
This web page was written and compiled by local residents Gerhard and Lone Hattingh and Tim Cann
Updated by GH in July 2025